Talk:Lookup Table: Difference between revisions
→Improve further: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
However, I suspect it needs some improvements. | However, I suspect it needs some improvements. | ||
How it can be improved in terms of phrasing and/or additional information ? [[User:DjSapsan|DjSapsan]] ([[User talk:DjSapsan|talk]]) 17:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC) | How it can be improved in terms of phrasing and/or additional information ? [[User:DjSapsan|DjSapsan]] ([[User talk:DjSapsan|talk]]) 17:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
@[[User:DjSapsan|DjSapsan]], | |||
Imo we should add that the AND-inputs may also be negated. | |||
And that a lut can only output a single bit, in the general case, and not a batch of outputs (instead of 'The output may be a single bit or a pattern of bits.') | |||
The "we can avoid delays by not using buffers" paragraph should imo be replaced with one that states that the not-inputs are generally fed through a fastbuffer first, so that no backpropagation happens. | |||
Lmk what you think, please [[User:GHXX|GHXX]] ([[User talk:GHXX|talk]]) 20:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:31, 7 September 2025
Improve further
Hi @GHXX and hi all, I made a change to the article to make it simpler and clearer. However, I suspect it needs some improvements. How it can be improved in terms of phrasing and/or additional information ? DjSapsan (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
@DjSapsan,
Imo we should add that the AND-inputs may also be negated.
And that a lut can only output a single bit, in the general case, and not a batch of outputs (instead of 'The output may be a single bit or a pattern of bits.')
The "we can avoid delays by not using buffers" paragraph should imo be replaced with one that states that the not-inputs are generally fed through a fastbuffer first, so that no backpropagation happens.
Lmk what you think, please GHXX (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)